There is a Publication Ban on this topic . That means that i am only allowed: a) to speak of aspects pertaining to the case directly related to my experience , b) on any forum i have access to , c) as long as i do not reveal any identifying information about any witnesses and/or jurors .;
Thruout this process , critical evidence was repeatedly forgotten or mishandled thruout the entire case .
Anything that could be used to humanize me was systematically forgotten with laser-guided precision .
I was not allowed to give any statements whatsoever . I was not given an opening statement , even so much as a Hello was shushed into oblivion , and the only time i was allowed to speak was in response to the lawyers• questions , which simply left out any of the years of prep work that went into my defense . I was not allowed to give a concluding statement , or to express my innocence in my own words at any time .
Like i said , the entire trial was on rails , and at my sentence hearing the judge is going to "impartially" decide how many years to sentence an M named KAI to , as i have already been left out of any further court proceedings until they day they put the handcuffs on me a thousand kilometres from home and take me to an unknown facility in the middle of nowhere . And however you want to define "Black bag her, lock her up, and throw away the key" .
For instance , this document wasn•t even brought up .
From the Police Report Assessing the Voluntariness of My Interrogation .
-
Transcript of KAI'ENNE (AKA KAI) WINTER Page 13 line 15-21
17. Detective ████████ made multiple inquiries and confirmation to ensure that Ms. Winter’s statement was being provided voluntarily and without coercion. These included the following exchanges.
Detective ████████:
“So you understand that here in that room that you don't… have to talk to me unless you want to.”Ms. Winter:
“That's what I'm saying.”Detective ████████:
“Okay. Because whatever you do say in this room could be used as evidence against you or anybody else in this case.”Ms. Winter:
“That's what I'm saying.”Transcript of KAI'ENNE (AKA KAI) WINTER Page 14 line 13-19
OFFICER: Okay. So a hundred percent you're sitting here because you wanna talk to me, right?
WINTER: Well, yes.
OFFICER: Okay.
WINTER: I know that I'm innocent.
OFFICER: Okay.
WINTER: I would like to clear this case.
Transcript of KAI'ENNE (AKA KAI) WINTER Page 15 line 22-28
18. Her motivation appeared to be personal—she wanted to explain her side and assert her innocence.
19. Conclusion: No inducements were present that could overbear her will. The Respondent was repeatedly informed of her right to remain silent and was explicitly asked to confirm that her participation in the interview was voluntary. She acknowledged understanding her rights and affirmed that she was speaking of her own volition. These statements support the position that her statement was made freely and voluntarily, without threats, promises, or inducements.
In the detective•s own words , i sounded like a normal and rational human adult trying to explain their side of an unclear situation .
This is a far cry from the jury . That jury finished damning me faster than the pizza could arrive on the first break of the first day , as if they had their answers cut out like cookies and baked to perfection for each and every one of them , via their social media targeting advertisement feeds and the Epstein Files beaming "BILLIONAIRE PEDOPHILES LITERALLY GETTING AWAY WITH MURDER, WON•T SOMEBODY DO SOMETHING?" from every syrface and screen vingt-quatre(24) heures pour jour , care of Facebook, the GRU, and CambridgeAnalytica .
des